RELIGIOUS POLICY IN THE AGE OF AI: A PERSONALIST INQUIRY INTO MORAL PRAXIS AND DIGITAL TRANSFORMATION

https://doi.org/10.31330/repo.v4i2.114

Authors

  • Patricius Neonnub Widya Mandira Catholic University, Indonesia
  • Oktovianus Yuda Pramana Widya Mandira Catholic University, Indonesia

Keywords:

Artificial Intelligence, Religious Policy, Digital Ethics, Personalism, Human Dignity

Abstract

The rapid advancement of artificial intelligence (AI) is transforming the foundations of religious authority and ethical formation in contemporary societies. This study examines how algorithmic systems—such as chatbots, recommendation algorithms, and AI-generated sermons—reshape religious legitimacy and moral discourse. Employing a conceptual–philosophical approach grounded in personalist realism, the research integrates theological anthropology with normative policy analysis to assess the ethical implications of AI in religious life. The findings indicate that AI shifts religious authority from institutional mediation toward algorithmic visibility and data-driven influence. While this transformation democratizes access to religious knowledge, it also fragments theological coherence and weakens interpretive accountability. A central moral paradox emerges: increased participation in religious discourse coexists with diminished spiritual depth and responsibility. Ethical concerns arise from distributed agency, opaque algorithmic processes, and the reduction of human dignity to data-based representations. The study argues that prevailing regulatory frameworks, which focus primarily on technical governance and risk mitigation, are insufficient to address the deeper moral challenges posed by AI in religious contexts. It therefore proposes a shift toward a transcendental policy framework that conceives governance as moral praxis oriented toward truth, responsibility, and human flourishing. Policy recommendations include the development of a Religious Digital Ethics Framework, the establishment of a Digital Religious Ethics Council, and the integration of interfaith digital ethics education. The study concludes that religious policy must be grounded in the principle of imago Dei, ensuring that technological innovation remains subordinate to human dignity and humanity’s spiritual vocation.

References

Campbell, H. A. (2021). Digital Religion: Understanding Religious Practice in Digital Media. Routledge.

Dunn, W. N. (2018). Public Policy Analysis: An Integrated Approach (6th ed.). Routledge.

Echchaibi, N., & Hoover, S. M. (2019). The Digital Religion Reader. Routledge.

Evolvi, G. (2021). Hyper-mediated religious spaces: Digital materiality and authority online. ZRG – Religion, Society, Politics.

Fioravante, R. (2024). Personalism in Generative AI Deployment. Ethics and Information Technology, 26(2), 163–179. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41463-024-00193-9

Fitryansyah, A. (2024). Artificial intelligence and Qur’anic interpretation: Preserving asalah in digital exegesis. Lektur Keagamaan.

Floridi, L. (2019). Establishing the rules for the ethical design of AI. Nature Machine Intelligence, 1(6), 261–262. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42256-019-0055-y

Gadamer, H.-G. (2004). Truth and Method (2nd rev.). Continuum.

Han, B.-C. (2021). Infocracy: Digitalization and the Crisis of Democracy. Polity Press.

He, X., Wang, Z., & Zhao, Y. (2024). Artificial intelligence and religious freedom: A cross-national analysis. Humanities & Social Sciences Communications, 11(3), 1–13.

Krąpiec, M. A. (2015). I-Man: An Outline of Philosophical Anthropology (T. Sandok, Trans.). Marquette University Press.

Kurata, N. (2025). Teaching Religion with AI: Pedagogical Opportunities and Risks. Elsevier.

Madjid, N. (1992). Islam, Kemodernan, dan Keindonesiaan. Mizan.

Maritain, J. (1943). The Rights of Man and Natural Law. Charles Scribner’s Sons.

Maryniarczyk, A. (2018). Discovery of the Internal Structure of Being. Polish Thomas Aquinas Association (PTTA).

Mazur, P., & Maryniarczyk, A. (2018). Personalizm Lubelski: Filozofia Człowieka w Szkole Lubelskiej. Polskie Towarzystwo Tomasza z Akwinu.

Ministry of Religion of the Republic of Indonesia. (2023). Digital Transformation of Religious Services. Ministry of Religion.

Papakostas, A. (2025). Algorithmic learning and religious education: Ethical implications of AI in RE classrooms. Religions, 16(4), 221–239.

Rähme, J. (2025). AI and religion: Myth, ritual, and governance in algorithmic cultures. Religion, 55(3), 310–328.

Sartori, G. (1970). Concept misformation in comparative politics. American Political Science Review, 64(4), 1033–1053.

Simmerlein, T. (2025). The first AI-led service and its implications for digital worship. Sociology of Religion, 86(2), 112–130.

Sugiyono. (2019). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan: Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.

Suharto, U. (2018). Kebijakan Keagamaan di Indonesia: Dialektika antara Negara dan Masyarakat. LKiS.

Tarwiyyah, L. (2025). Algorithmic bias and religious leadership in digital ecosystems. Jurnal Informasi dan Teknologi, 9(1), 45–59.

Tsuria, R. (2024). AI representations of world religions: Bias and theological flattening. Religions, 15(2), 98–115.

UNESCO. (2021). AI and Education: Guidance for Policy Makers. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000376709

Wojtyla, K. (1979). The acting person (Issue 1). D. Reidel Pub. Co.

Zhang, L. (2025). Cognitive bias and religious framing in generative AI models. Journal of Educational Technology & Ethics, 14(1), 56–74.

Published

2025-12-31

How to Cite

Neonnub, P., & Yuda Pramana, O. (2025). RELIGIOUS POLICY IN THE AGE OF AI: A PERSONALIST INQUIRY INTO MORAL PRAXIS AND DIGITAL TRANSFORMATION. Journal of Religious Policy, 4(2), 237–264. https://doi.org/10.31330/repo.v4i2.114