AMBIGUITY IN THE IMPLEMENTATION OF RELIGIOUS MODERATION ON AHMADIYYA AND SHI‘A SECTS IN INDONESIA

AMBIGUITAS IMPLEMENTASI MODERASI BERAGAMA PADA ALIRAN AHMADIYAH DAN SYIAH DI INDONESIA

https://doi.org/10.31330/repo.v3i1.74

Authors

  • Syamsul Haq Universitas Islam Internasional Indonesia, Indonesia

Keywords:

Ambiguity of Implementation, Religious of Moderation, Sect, Ahmadiyah, Shi'i

Abstract

The government is currently expanding its religious moderation program as a response and effort to minimize the problem of extremism and exclusivism. Ahmadiyya and Shi'a are two secs that often get discrimination from various parties, even from within the religious community itself. The implementation of religious moderation is apparently only felt by some religious groups in Indonesia. The ambiguity of this phenomenon undermines the assumption that the State prioritizes tolerant and moderate practices towards various religious groups; in fact, the application of moderation does not apply to different sect groups even though they adhere to the same religion. This study aims to analyze the ambiguity of implementing religious moderation on the Ahmadiyya and Shi'a sect groups in Indonesia. This research uses qualitative methods and literature studies as additional references. The informants in this research are representatives of young people from Jamaah Ahmadiyah Indonesia (JAI) and Ahlul Bait Indonesia (ABI). Data collection used observation, interview, and library research from journal articles, books, and information from the internet as secondary sources. The results of this study conclude that the ambiguity of the application of religious moderation in Indonesia is still not fully felt by minority sect groups such as Ahmadiyya and Shi’a. The majority of Muslims, especially those of the Sunni faith, show greater tolerance and moderation towards followers of other religions. Consequently, the idea of religious moderation is only fully practiced for those who belong to different religions.

References

Abbas, M., & Ahmad, M. (2024). The development of the Nūrbakhshī Sufi order in Gilgit-Baltistan.

Abror, M. (2020). Moderasi beragama dalam bingkai toleransi. Rusydiah: Jurnal Pemikiran Islam, 1(2), 137-148. https://doi.org/10.35961/rsd.v1i2.174

Ahmad, C. T. (2023, November). Wawancara narasumber dari AMSA (Ahmadiyyah Muslim Student Associations).

Ahmad, M., Bunyamin, B., Nawawi, M. A., Pratama, C. A., & Junior, R. (2022). The struggle for recognition: A study of the existence of the Indonesian Ahmadiyya community in the concept of Axel Honneth’s recognition. Muharrik: Jurnal Dakwah dan Sosial, 5(2), 307-320. https://doi.org/10.37680/muharrik.v5i2.1648

Akhmadi, A. (2019). Moderasi beragama dalam keragaman Indonesia. Religious Moderation in Indonesia’s Diversity, 13(2).

Al-Asyhar, T. (2023). Implementasi moderasi beragama (MB) melalui pendekatan kognitif berbasis karakter, 16(1).

Amal, M. K. (2020). Towards a deliberative conflict resolution? A reflection on state inclusive response to Sunni-Shi’a tension in Indonesia’s democracy. QIJIS (Qudus International Journal of Islamic Studies), 8(2), 226. https://doi.org/10.21043/qijis.v8i2.7146

Azizah, L. (2022). Refleksi moderasi beragama dalam penyelesaian konflik Ahmadiyah Lombok (Cetakan pertama). Depok, Sleman, Yogyakarta: Pustaka Egaliter.

Baker, C. D. (2019). Medieval Islamic sectarianism. Arc Humanities Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvmd83hw

BBC Indonesia. (2023, August 3). Ritual Asyura Syiah di Bandung sempat dilabeli ’sesat’—Apa yang terjadi dan bagaimana nasib pengikutnya di Indonesia? Retrieved December 16, 2023, from BBC News Indonesia website: https://www.bbc.com/indonesia/articles/cq5yd74908yo

Bendix, R. (2024). Inequality and social structure: A comparison of Marx and Weber.

Brooke, S. (2017). Sectarianism and social conformity: Evidence from Egypt. Political Research Quarterly, 70(4), 848-860. https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912917717641

Bruinessen, M. V. (2018). Comparing the governance of Islam in Turkey and Indonesia.

Burhani, A. N. (2013). When Muslims are not Muslims: The Ahmadiyya community and the discourse on heresy in Indonesia.

Crane, L. B., Yeager, E., & Whitman, R. L. (1981). An introduction to linguistics. Little, Brown.

Formichi, C. (2014a). Shaping Shiʿa identities in contemporary Indonesia between local tradition and foreign orthodoxy. Die Welt des Islams, 54(2), 212-236. https://doi.org/10.1163/15700607-00542p04

Formichi, C. (2014b). Violence, sectarianism, and the politics of religion: Articulations of anti-Shi’a discourses in Indonesia.

Frisch, D., & Baron, J. (1988). Ambiguity and rationality. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 1(3), 149-157. https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.3960010303

Gaiser, A. (2017). A narrative identity approach to Islamic sectarianism.

Haddad, F. (2020). The study of sectarian relations: Key debates. In F. Haddad, Understanding “Sectarianism” (pp. 49-80). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197510629.003.0003

Hadi, S. (2015). Metodologi riset (Cetakan I). Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Hamdi, A. Z. (2014). Klaim religious authority dalam konflik Sunni-Syi‘i Sampang Madura. Islamica: Jurnal Studi Keislaman, 6(2), 215. https://doi.org/10.15642/islamica.2012.6.2.215-231

Hashemi, N., & Postel, D. (2017). Sectarianization: Mapping the new politics of the Middle East.

Hasyim, M. (2012). Shia: Its history and development in Indonesia. Analisa Journal of Social Science and Religion, 19(2), 147-158.

Hicks, J. (2023). Heresy and authority: Understanding the turn against Ahmadiyah in Indonesia.

Institute, A. (2021). Potret umat beragama 2021. Retrieved January 14, 2024, from https://alvara-strategic.com/potret-umat-beragama-2021/

Iran Project. (2019). Engaging sectarian de-escalation.

Irawan, D. R. (2023, July 25). Moderasi beragama dan urgensinya dalam perspektif tokoh Jemaat Ahmadiyah di Banjarmasin. Retrieved June 11, 2024, from https://idr.uin-antasari.ac.id/24601/

Kamseno, S., & Putri, S. (2022). Problematika paradox of tolerance dalam implementasi pengarusutamaan moderasi beragama, sebuah perspektif filsafat, 15(2).

Litbang (Ed.). (2019). Moderasi beragama (Cetakan pertama). Jakarta: Badan Litbang dan Diklat, Kementerian Agama RI.

LSI, A. (2023, May 19). Violent extremism report. Retrieved June 13, 2024, from https://www.lsi.or.id/post/copy-of-violent-extremism-report

Media, K. C. (2021, November 25). Sejarah Ahmadiyah di Indonesia halaman all. Retrieved January 14, 2024, from https://www.kompas.com/stori/read/2021/11/25/120000779/sejarah-ahmadiyah-di-indonesia

Mohseni, P., Sagha, M., Hasan, M., Brown, J., Akyol, M., Kazerooni, I., & Prodromou, E. (2022). Five myths of sectarianism.

Muchtar, C., Dwi Noviani, Mardeli, Mutiara, & Manna Dey. (2022). Religious moderation in the framework of life. International Journal of Islamic Education, Research and Multiculturalism (IJIERM), 4(2), 135-149. https://doi.org/10.47006/ijierm.v4i2.142

Mukhibat, M., Nurhidayati Istiqomah, A., & Hidayah, N. (2023). Pendidikan moderasi beragama di Indonesia (wacana dan kebijakan). Southeast Asian Journal of Islamic Education Management, 4(1), 73-88. https://doi.org/10.21154/sajiem.v4i1.133

Munawan, M. (2023, November). Wawancara narasumber PANDU Ahlul Bait bidang kepemudaan pusat.

Muwahidah, S. S. (2016). For the love of Ahl al-Bayt: Transcending Sunni-Shiʿi sectarian allegiance. Journal of Shi’a Islamic Studies, 9(3), 327-358. https://doi.org/10.1353/isl.2016.0026

Nasr, S. H. (1970). Shi’ism and Sufism: Their relationship in essence and in history. Religious Studies, 6(3), 229-242. Retrieved from JSTOR.

Potter, L. G. (2015). Sectarianism in the Middle East. Great Decisions, 29-40. Retrieved from JSTOR.

PPIM, U. J. (2021). Hasil penelitian potret moderasi beragama di kalangan mahasiswa Muslim kasus tiga kampus Islam (Jakarta, Bandung, Yogyakarta).

Ropi, I. (2010). Islamism, government regulation, and the Ahmadiyah controversies in Indonesia. Al-Jami’ah: Journal of Islamic Studies, 48(2), 281-320. https://doi.org/10.14421/ajis.2010.482.281-320

Saikal, A. (2012). Afghanistan: The status of the Shi’ite Hazara minority. Journal of Muslim Minority Affairs, 32(1), 80-87. https://doi.org/10.1080/13602004.2012.665623

Setara Institute. (2023). Kondisi kebebasan beragama/berkeyakinan di Indonesia 2021. Retrieved December 16, 2023, from https://setara-institute.org/kondisi-kebebasan-beragamaberkeyakinan-di-indonesia-2021/

Sigit, K. A., Hasan, H., Sutrisno, C., Nugroho, Z., Novianingrum, A., Insiyah, S., & Yosarie, I. (2021). Intoleransi semasa pandemi: Laporan kebebasan beragama dan berkeyakinan 2020.

Sinaga, M. H. S., Maulana, A., Akbar, I., Lubis, M. A., Haikal, H., & Siregar, R. M. (2022). Peran Kementrian Agama dalam moderasi beragama. Jurnal Al-Qiyam, 3(1), 21-25. https://doi.org/10.33648/alqiyam.v3i1.179

Sujadmi, S. (2013). Yang minoritas: Yang tertindas (analisis konflik Ahmadiyah vs “Islam”). Society, 1(1), 75-85. https://doi.org/10.33019/society.v1i1.44

Sumarto, S. (2021). Implementasi program moderasi beragama Kementerian Agama RI. Jurnal Pendidikan Guru, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.47783/jurpendigu.v3i1.294

Tanjung, S. R. (2022). Implementasi moderasi beragama pada program kerukunan umat beragama dan layanan kehidupan umat beragama. Kompetensi, 7(1), 17-28. https://doi.org/10.47655/kompetensi.v7i1.22

Taufani, T. (2023). Sunni-Syiah sebagai belenggu sejarah: Mengurai pemikiran Ahmad Syafii Maarif tentang konflik internal umat Islam. Maarif, 18(1), 115-138. https://doi.org/10.47651/mrf.v18i1.214

Yosarie, I., Insiyah, S., & Buntara, S. A. (2021). Inklusi Jemaat Ahmadiyah dalam keIndonesiaan.

Zaman, M. Q. (1998). Sectarianism in Pakistan: The radicalization of Shi‘i and Sunni identities. Modern Asian Studies, 32(3), 689-716. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0026749X98003217

Published

2024-06-30

How to Cite

Haq, S. (2024). AMBIGUITY IN THE IMPLEMENTATION OF RELIGIOUS MODERATION ON AHMADIYYA AND SHI‘A SECTS IN INDONESIA: AMBIGUITAS IMPLEMENTASI MODERASI BERAGAMA PADA ALIRAN AHMADIYAH DAN SYIAH DI INDONESIA. Journal of Religious Policy, 3(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.31330/repo.v3i1.74